DUOLABS
Our Services

AI & Tech Advisory

We clarify the technologies and priorities that fit your business stage, so you spend less on trial and error.

Timeline
By arrangement
Build cost
By arrangement
Time to start
Same day to a few days

Who this fits

  • Companies ready to outsource development but unsure what to actually ask for
  • Situations where the quotes you received disagree and you cannot tell which is right
  • Organizations hearing they should adopt AI but unclear what fits their actual work

How far we take it

Included

  • Mapping where you are now and what you are aiming at
  • Deciding what comes first and what waits
  • Comparing the technical options and what each one costs you
  • Reviewing quotes you received and pointing out what is missing
  • A phased plan with rough sizing
  • A written summary of everything we settled

Not included

  • The development or build work itself
  • Brokering or reselling a particular vendor or product
  • Accounting or legal advice
  • On-site presence or sitting in your regular meetings

How it runs

  1. 01

    Discovery

    We define the core user problem and align on scope and priorities.

  2. 02

    Design

    We design the structure and flows, validating fast with prototypes.

  3. 03

    Build

    We build maintainable systems with tests and code review.

  4. 04

    Launch

    We ship reliably with release automation and store submission.

  5. 05

    Operate

    We operate long-term with observability, logs, and metrics.

Frequently asked questions

Yes. That is what this is for. You get the outcome as a document you can hand to any vendor, and having it makes comparing quotes easier. If hiring us were the premise, this would be sales rather than advice.

It depends on scope. Helping with one or two decisions is short; laying out a whole plan means time to read your material and organise it. We start by hearing what you want to settle, then agree on scope, duration, and cost together. We cannot post a price up front because the scope differs every time.

Yes. Reviewing a project in flight easily turns into judging people, though, so it helps to be clear about what you want checked. Framing it as answerable questions works better: is the schedule realistic, is the remaining scope achievable, is this in a state that could be handed over.

Possibly not. Work with little repetition, where the criteria differ from person to person, or where a wrong result is hard to undo, is not where it belongs yet. If we judge you do not need it, we say so. It is the same standard as not proposing a system when we think you do not need one.

Related public docs

Proposals, scope guides, and build examples we publish openly.

See all public docs

A vague scope is fine

Tell us where things stand and we will point to the scope you need and a rough size.