AI & Tech Advisory
We clarify the technologies and priorities that fit your business stage, so you spend less on trial and error.
Who this fits
- Companies ready to outsource development but unsure what to actually ask for
- Situations where the quotes you received disagree and you cannot tell which is right
- Organizations hearing they should adopt AI but unclear what fits their actual work
How far we take it
Included
- Mapping where you are now and what you are aiming at
- Deciding what comes first and what waits
- Comparing the technical options and what each one costs you
- Reviewing quotes you received and pointing out what is missing
- A phased plan with rough sizing
- A written summary of everything we settled
Not included
- The development or build work itself
- Brokering or reselling a particular vendor or product
- Accounting or legal advice
- On-site presence or sitting in your regular meetings
How it runs
- 01
Discovery
We define the core user problem and align on scope and priorities.
- 02
Design
We design the structure and flows, validating fast with prototypes.
- 03
Build
We build maintainable systems with tests and code review.
- 04
Launch
We ship reliably with release automation and store submission.
- 05
Operate
We operate long-term with observability, logs, and metrics.
Frequently asked questions
Yes. That is what this is for. You get the outcome as a document you can hand to any vendor, and having it makes comparing quotes easier. If hiring us were the premise, this would be sales rather than advice.
It depends on scope. Helping with one or two decisions is short; laying out a whole plan means time to read your material and organise it. We start by hearing what you want to settle, then agree on scope, duration, and cost together. We cannot post a price up front because the scope differs every time.
Yes. Reviewing a project in flight easily turns into judging people, though, so it helps to be clear about what you want checked. Framing it as answerable questions works better: is the schedule realistic, is the remaining scope achievable, is this in a state that could be handed over.
Possibly not. Work with little repetition, where the criteria differ from person to person, or where a wrong result is hard to undo, is not where it belongs yet. If we judge you do not need it, we say so. It is the same standard as not proposing a system when we think you do not need one.
Related public docs
Proposals, scope guides, and build examples we publish openly.
앱·서비스 출시 및 외부 심사 안내
모바일 앱과 외부 플랫폼 연동 서비스는 개발이 완료된 뒤에도 개발자 계정 확인, 정책 점검과 운영 사업자의 심사를 거칠 수 있습니다. 이 문서는 앱스토어 등록과 외부 심사가 포함된 프로젝트의 준비 사항과 역할을 안내합니다. 듀오랩스가…
프로젝트 일시중단·재개·종료 안내
프로젝트는 자료 제공, 의사결정, 대금 지급, 외부 승인 또는 예상하지 못한 위험으로 인해 계획대로 계속하기 어려울 수 있습니다. 이 문서는 일시중단, 재개와 중도 종료가 필요한 경우의 일반적인 처리 원칙을 안내합니다. 중단 사유,…
검수·승인 및 하자 판정 기준
이 문서는 듀오랩스가 수행한 개발 프로젝트의 결과물을 확인하고, 수정 요청을 하자·범위 내 조정·추가 작업으로 구분하는 일반 기준을 안내합니다. 검수 대상, 기간, 완료 조건과 하자 보수 범위는 프로젝트마다 다를 수 있습니다. 실제…
고객 포털 이용 안내
듀오랩스 고객 포털은 계약 고객이 자신의 프로젝트 진행 정보와 관련 자료를 확인하고 담당자에게 문의할 수 있는 서비스입니다. 제공되는 화면과 기능은 프로젝트 상태, 계약 범위와 등록된 자료에 따라 달라질 수 있습니다. 고객 포털은 진…
A vague scope is fine
Tell us where things stand and we will point to the scope you need and a rough size.